Captain Courageous
Uncategorized - - Posted on March, 2 at 3:22 pm by Ken L
I never understood the uncritical admiration heaped upon Captain Brough, late minister in the Howard Government and (very) late convert to the cause of improving the condition of indigenous people. In all the euphoria surrounding Teh Apology I even read suggestions that Brough and Noel Pearson be given unlimited power and resources to go and ’sort things out’. I toyed with the notion of supporting this bit of inspired lunacy, just to watch the fun, but then realised the good captain had already managed to transform a $10 million program into upwards of a billion in just a few short months and I’m sick of politicians having fun with my money.
Even some people who are normally quite sensible Labor supporters get all misty-eyed about Brough and his alleged high principles. They express hope that such a good man might be lured back into federal parliament, or at least take over the handful of losers passing as the Queensland Libs. Maybe deep down a lot of people still love a soldier and they go all gooey when they hear that crisp tone of command barking military jargon about clearing the ground and securing the territory as precursors to sending out search-and-destroy patrols to net hordes of sexual predators (correct me if I missed something but as far as I know the total number of sexual offenders arrested so far in the course of Teh NT Intervention is still 0).
To me, Brough was a dangerously simplistic, humourless, slightly unbalanced individual who was incapable of seeing the wood for the trees. Ask him to discuss his political ideology and I reckon he’d be struggling to talk for more than about 30 seconds without resorting to lame clichés. He’s just a bundle of entrenched conservative prejudices masquerading as ‘good old-fashioned values’. Does he have kids? Brrrrr.
Anyway you might be interested to know that since losing his seat (with a bigger swing against him than the state average … looks like his local electors didn’t buy the stuff about him being the good apple in the barrel), Brough has apparently become a property developer. It’s amazing that an ex-army officer and MP has the capital but maybe he’s acquired wealth from other sources. Oh wait, he has ‘business partners’ (white shoes? they don’t say) so maybe he’s bringing expertise and contacts to the business; in fact, that’s what seems to have the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner a little concerned.
Brough’s business is on the Tiwi Islands, which has the only indigenous land council that agreed to switch to a 99 year lease deal for native title lands under the changes Brough introduced when he was minister:
A spokesman for the Tiwi Land Council has confirmed the former Indigenous Affairs Minister Mal Brough has flagged a proposal for housing developments on Bathurst Island.
Brian Clancy says Mr Brough travelled to the island recently with two interstate business partners.
Mr Clancy says Mal Brough is set to profit from the project, but says Tiwi Islanders will also benefit.
He says the 99 year lease agreement signed when Mr Brough was Indigenous affair minister has opened up several development opportunities, and this latest development could break the welfare cycle in Nguiu.
This is what concerns the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner:
“As minister, Mr Brough, to be able to get (Nguiu) to sign up to a 99-year lease, provided them with a very significant amount of funding,” Mr Calma told Network Ten.
“And as Aboriginal people, they will feel there is a reciprocal obligation and engage him.
“I think the question that I am surprised has not been asked, is this a legitimate way to go forward?”
Captain Brough gave a measured and fact-filled response:
Mr Brough said Mr Calma’s comments were “disgusting and ill-founded”.
“It just shows where this man comes from, and he needs to have a long, hard look at where his priorities lie, and his priorities should be lying with the protection of children who he has responsibility for, but he has failed at his duty,” Mr Brough said.
But cap’n, can’t he protect the children and look into your land dealings simultaneously? Your military mind may have been trained to concentrate single-mindedly on a solitary objective but multi-tasking is a skill quite a lot of us social science types have acquired. Anyone would think you were trying to change the subject, but we know you would never ever try to use child sexual abuse as a distraction from other, more awkward questions.
From time to time people mutter about the propriety of ex ministers taking jobs after they leave parliament that give rise to the perception they might have used their ministerial office to give themselves a bit of a head start. Indeed there’s an interesting paper on the subject here (.doc file). Is Brough’s project any different to the cases of Reith joining a defence contractor, Carr joining a merchant bank or Wooldridge joining the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners?
Perhaps they should invite the captain to be a guest speaker at next year’s Australian Public Sector Anti-Corruption Conference.
Posted in Uncategorized |


March 2nd, 2008 at 4:22 pm
You forgot to mention the money he sucked out of the NT mining fund, to his seat and was spent on a music fete.
March 2nd, 2008 at 4:29 pm
I nominated Brough as a self serving bullshit artist early on, much to the guffs of some people I know.
A bit of ICAC wouldn’t go astray here.
March 2nd, 2008 at 8:16 pm
It was a hard choice, [who to leave out?] but I put Brough 2nd in my list of worst ministers of the Howard govt.
Ruddock was cemented in first place.
March 2nd, 2008 at 8:52 pm
Must be good to be an irreverent comedian about Liberals like Brough,I cannot laugh though you punished me completely with your belief in the Public Service,who serviced these Liberal and now Labor arseholes!?It seems likely I will be a criminal soon,dont care,just want to see my day in court.And I just dont care if I am the guilty one…because I will keep my mouth shut..in complete defiance of being judged.
March 2nd, 2008 at 9:51 pm
How disgraceful is Brough? But then again, how appalling is the so-called leader of the opposition, who is insisting on the right of the well intentioned saviour of all things indigenous to be a party to the Rudd govts. approach to the intervention?
Talk about jobs for the incompetent and possibly corrupt. But that’s OK, as long as we only steal from blackfella.
This is yet another outrageous example of former govt. ministers using their former portfolios to benefit themselves. And this great champion of the disadvantaged is a truly stark reminder of giving the morally corrupt power.
Disgusted,I am.
March 2nd, 2008 at 10:19 pm
Yep, here’s another one who pinned Cap’n Brough as an incompetent, hypocritical, self-serving, political hit man very early in the piece.
His all-purpose defence line that ‘you don’t care about the kiddies’ is wearing real thin, real fast among the people who do actually care and have actually been trying to do something about the kiddies (in the face of government and community apathy) long before Brough was able to wipe his own behind.
I held him in contempt when he was in office, and see no reason to change that view.
March 3rd, 2008 at 11:48 am
Oh LOL! Gawd knows, if you can’t mark your tutorial papers whilst simultaneously remembering to be subtle about peeking down the departmental secretary’s blouse, you might get a stern talking to from the Dean. Eventually.
How could the simplicity and lack of consequence of a military campaign compare?
March 3rd, 2008 at 11:28 pm
I’m always of these leases being negotiated. At the end of 99 years what happens? The inhabitants of the property just walk away?
My understanding is the owner of the land has to pay those who inhabit the property with the costs of the land development.
In this case if the original owners don’t invest the money wisely and get a return that exceeds the appreciation of the developments works then they can’t have it back.
This is really dodgy stuff. Very conservative.
March 4th, 2008 at 7:06 pm
The first time I heard him speak I thought he was dangerous; by the time he referred to ‘clearing the jargon jargon jargon’ I think I referred to him as an ‘A class C-word’, a term I usually reserve for Scottish project managers.
Unbalanced? - very!